[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214203710.GA162892@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:37:10 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@...cle.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: Descope pci_printk() to aer_printk()
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 01:56:47PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 06:10:12PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > include/linux/pci.h provides low-level pci_printk() interface that is
> > > only used by AER because it needs to print the same message with
> > > different levels depending on the error severity. No other PCI code
> > > uses that functionality and calls pci_<level>() logging functions
> > > directly with the appropriate level.
> > >
> > > Descope pci_printk() into AER as aer_printk().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > I applied this patch by itself on pci/aer for v6.15.
> >
> > We also have some work-in-progress on rate limiting errors, which
> > might conflict, but this is simple and shouldn't be hard to reconcile.
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > index db9b47ce3eef..02d23e795915 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > @@ -2685,9 +2685,6 @@ void pci_uevent_ers(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum pci_ers_result err_type);
> > >
> > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > >
> > > -#define pci_printk(level, pdev, fmt, arg...) \
> > > - dev_printk(level, &(pdev)->dev, fmt, ##arg)
>
> Both shpchp and aer do use pci_printk() before this series (it seems LKP
> has also catched it already).
>
> If you split this series into different branches, this removal of
> pci_printk() has to be postponed until the next kernel release (fine for
> me if that's what you want to do, just remove this part from this patch
> and perhaps adjust the commit message to say it's to prepare for removal
> of the pci_printk()).
OK. I dropped the pci_printk() removal for now. I'm anticipating
more AER changes this cycle, so I'm trying to keep those isolated.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists