[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mqkoSkh_3Q1XYuA_Q7AqRFt1wD_Mkf1nPTbbSHKQz48g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 21:49:14 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] rust: kunit: Support KUnit tests with a user-space
like syntax
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:41 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> After much delay, v6 of the KUnit/Rust integration patchset is here.
> This change incorporates most of Miguels suggestions from v5 (save for
> some of the copyright headers I wasn't comfortable unilaterally
> changing). This means the documentation is much improved, and it should
> work more cleanly on Rust 1.83 and 1.84, no longer requiring
> static_mut_refs or const_mut_refs. (I'm not 100% sure I understand all
> of the details of this, but I'm comfortable enough with how it's ended
> up.)
Thanks a lot, David, really.
I am happy to take it through Rust or KUnit -- I am not sure yet how
many conflicts we will have on our side.
I will give it a go when you think it is ready (since I saw comments
from Tamir, though not sure how many you may want to address --
perhaps the sooner we land this, the easier it may be...).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists