linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: sophgo: add RTC support for Sophgo CV1800 series SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <964a016b944b459a9a914abac539350769323259.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 12:09:37 +0100
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, 
	robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	unicorn_wang@...look.com, inochiama@...look.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, 
	palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, dlan@...too.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	 <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: sophgo: add RTC support for
 Sophgo CV1800 series SoC

Hi Inochi,

On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 17:40 +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +
> > +    rtc@...5000 {
> > +        compatible = "sophgo,cv1800-rtc";
> > +        reg = <0x5025000 0x2000>;
> > +        interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +        clocks = <&osc>;
> > +    };
> > -- 
> 
> Just for curiosity, Do you leave a way to implement the
> 8051 subsys, since its registers are in rtc. (You can
> check the chapter "8051 subsystem" of the SG2002, which
> can be found at https://github.com/sophgo/sophgo-doc).

well, I suppose, you know the answer, according to how this has been modelled
within this series, all the functionality could only be added on top of RTC
driver. Do you think it's time to re-design it as compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"
with children nodes for RTC and reboot?

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin.