[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2306bc17-d1bd-44b0-b5a0-5ddb8c8d30f7@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:58:31 -0600
From: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, Dan Williams
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov"
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Kuppuswamy
Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/tdx: Add tdx_mcall_rtmr_extend() interface
On 2/16/2025 6:40 PM, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
>> @@ -135,6 +136,41 @@ int tdx_mcall_get_report0(u8 *reportdata, u8
>> *tdreport)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tdx_mcall_get_report0);
>> +/**
>> + * tdx_mcall_rtmr_extend() - Wrapper to extend RTMR registers using
>> + * TDG.MR.RTMR.EXTEND TDCALL.
>
> Nit: I would prefer to name it as tdx_mcall_extend_rtmr() since this
> matches the existing tdx_mcall_get_report0() (and tdx_hcall_get_quote())
> better. But no strong opinion.
>
This actually my preference too!
Sathy, what do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists