[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB71345FB3EA6A7AE492D62E5589FB2@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 07:11:52 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 02/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for
mce_threshold_create_device()
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 12:46 AM
> To: x86@...nel.org; Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-edac@...r.kernel.org;
> Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com; Yazen Ghannam
> <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 02/16] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for
> mce_threshold_create_device()
>
> The return value is no longer checked, so set return type to 'void'.
>
This change can also be applied to mce_threshold_remove_device().
> Also, move function declarations to internal.h, since this function is only used
> within the MCE subsystem.
This change can also be applied to mce_threshold_remove_device().
So, can we also apply the two changes above for mce_threshold_remove_device()
in this patch?
-Qiuxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists