lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8734gb8jfl.fsf@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:35:26 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,  Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
  Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,  Alexander Viro
 <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,  Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,  Matt
 Harvey <mharvey@...ptrading.com>,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] vfs: export invalidate_inodes()

On Tue, Feb 18 2025, Jan Kara wrote:

> On Sun 16-02-25 16:50:07, Luis Henriques wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
>
> Please use evict_inodes(). It is already exported and does exactly the same
> these days. We should really merge the patch deleting invalidate_inodes()
> :)

Thank you for the suggestion, Jan.  Yeah that makes sense, of course.

However, since it's still not clear what's the future of this patchset
will be, I'll hold on re-sending it for now, but I'll definitely replace
invalidate_inodes() in a future revision.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís


>
> 									Honza
>
>> ---
>>  fs/inode.c         | 1 +
>>  fs/internal.h      | 1 -
>>  include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
>>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
>> index 5587aabdaa5e..88387ecb2c34 100644
>> --- a/fs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/inode.c
>> @@ -939,6 +939,7 @@ void invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
>>  
>>  	dispose_list(&dispose);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inodes);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Isolate the inode from the LRU in preparation for freeing it.
>> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
>> index e7f02ae1e098..7cb515cede3f 100644
>> --- a/fs/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/internal.h
>> @@ -207,7 +207,6 @@ bool in_group_or_capable(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>>   * fs-writeback.c
>>   */
>>  extern long get_nr_dirty_inodes(void);
>> -void invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * dcache.c
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
>> index 2c3b2f8a621f..ff016885646e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
>> @@ -3270,6 +3270,7 @@ extern void discard_new_inode(struct inode *);
>>  extern unsigned int get_next_ino(void);
>>  extern void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb);
>>  void dump_mapping(const struct address_space *);
>> +extern void invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Userspace may rely on the inode number being non-zero. For example, glibc
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ