lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7a2709b-f7ad-469e-86f3-6db4b4b3b37a@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:33:43 -0600
From: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, <andreas@...nade.info>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
        <rogerq@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <m-leonard@...com>, <praneeth@...com>,
        <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC GPIO Support

Hi,


On 2/13/25 2:11 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:12 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 2/7/25 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>>>> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>>>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>>>> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>>>
>>>> This follow-up series is dependent on:
>>>> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
>>>> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
>>>> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>>>>
>>> Did these go into v6.14?
>>>
>>> Bart
>> The dependencies listed in the cover letter were just applied by Lee Jones:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/173928615760.2233464.12306998726512431222.b4-ty@kernel.org/
>>
>> The rest of this series still applies without a need for code modifications.
>>
> I'm not sure I'm following: should this series wait until v6.15-rc1 is
> tagged? Or did you ask Lee to create an immutable branch? Or doesn't
> this series depend on the MFD changes at all after all?
>
> Bart

Sorry about the confusion. Lee didn't create an immutable branch and the series does depend on the MFD changes,
so this GPIO series should wait till v6.15-rc1 is tagged. Thank you!


-- 
Best,
Shree Ramamoorthy
PMIC Software Engineer


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ