linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC GPIO Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfR2q8TTcEHtbX9HxyFikHP_nS+Mva3dTwmgu4tvkxJ1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:11:52 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
Cc: aaro.koskinen@....fi, andreas@...nade.info, khilman@...libre.com, 
	rogerq@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, 
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, m-leonard@...com, praneeth@...com, 
	christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add TI TPS65215 PMIC GPIO Support

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:12 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2/7/25 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com> wrote:
> >> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
> >> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
> >> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
> >>
> >> This follow-up series is dependent on:
> >> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
> >> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
> >> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
> >>
> > Did these go into v6.14?
> >
> > Bart
>
> The dependencies listed in the cover letter were just applied by Lee Jones:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/173928615760.2233464.12306998726512431222.b4-ty@kernel.org/
>
> The rest of this series still applies without a need for code modifications.
>

I'm not sure I'm following: should this series wait until v6.15-rc1 is
tagged? Or did you ask Lee to create an immutable branch? Or doesn't
this series depend on the MFD changes at all after all?

Bart