[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250218211200.GA991534-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:12:00 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Siddharth Menon <simeddon@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwlock: Convert to dtschema
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 09:39:35PM +0530, Siddharth Menon wrote:
> From: BiscuitBobby <simeddon@...il.com>
>
> Convert the generic hwspinlock bindings to DT schema.
> ---
> This is my first time converting bindings to dt schema, please let me
> know if I have overlooked anything.
> .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt | 59 -----------------
> .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.yaml
The consumer side lives in dtschema already. Please add the provider
side there too. Patches to devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org or GH PR are
fine.
For the descriptions, you'll need to relicense the text in hwlock.txt to
dual GPL/BSD. You will need TI's permission for that.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists