linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwlock: Convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGd6pzMLQary4PYHN_7vc4xoS3SiAs_Rva+HymcXi_OFoGSakw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 16:21:28 +0530
From: Siddharth Menon <simeddon@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, 
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwlock: Convert to dtschema

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 02:42, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The consumer side lives in dtschema already. Please add the provider
> side there too. Patches to devicetree-spec@...r.kernel.org or GH PR are
> fine.

Thank you and Krzysztof for the feedback, I shall address the issues in the
next patch set.

> For the descriptions, you'll need to relicense the text in hwlock.txt to
> dual GPL/BSD. You will need TI's permission for that.

Regarding the relicensing, should I first submit a patch to relicense
the hwlock.txt
binding, then follow up with a patch to replace it with the YAML file
and correct
incorrect paths?

Regards,
Siddharth Menon