[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7RlE+QfzdQ07spk@vaman>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:16:43 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, srk@...com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma-glue: Drop skip_fdq argument from
k3_udma_glue_reset_rx_chn
On 16-01-25, 17:00, Roger Quadros wrote:
> The user of k3_udma_glue_reset_rx_chn() e.g. ti_am65_cpsw_nuss can
> run on multiple platforms having different DMA architectures.
> On some platforms there can be one FDQ for all flows in the RX channel
> while for others there is a separate FDQ for each flow in the RX channel.
>
> So far we have been relying on the skip_fdq argument of
> k3_udma_glue_reset_rx_chn().
>
> Instead of relying on the user to provide this information, infer it
> based on DMA architecture during k3_udma_glue_request_rx_chn() and save it
> in an internal flag 'single_fdq'. Use that flag at
> k3_udma_glue_reset_rx_chn() to deicide if the FDQ needs
> to be cleared for every flow or just for flow 0.
This fails to apply for me on dmaengine/fixes, can you please rebase and
resend
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists