linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] module: Add module_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z7YAlxfC9RfMfNew@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:02:31 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] module: Add module_for_each_mod() function

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:24:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:21:20 -0800
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > The patch is not OK, you're looking at old code, look at
> > modules-next and as Petr suggested look at Sebastian's recently
> > merged work.
> > 
> > git remote add korg-modules git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git
> 
> Would this be OK?
> 
> I have this on v6.14-rc3, and it doesn't cause any conflicts when I merge
> it with modules-next, and it builds fine.

Seems more in line with what is used now.

  Luis