[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2930024a88be186faa6a0338fc003e8ffefb710b.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:42:21 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
nadav.amit@...il.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jackmanb@...gle.com,
jannh@...gle.com, mhklinux@...look.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, Manali
Shukla <Manali.Shukla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/12] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code
On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 13:04 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:13:56AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > index 000000000000..a1d5dedd5217
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/invlpgb.h
>
> I remember asking you to add all that gunk to
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h.
> Please do so.
Dave just asked me to split out more things into
their own files.
I'm happy to do whatever the maintainers want,
but when you both want the opposite from each
other, I won't be able to make you both happy.
What should I be doing here?
--
All Rights Reversed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists