[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFPaVY1EHus1p0SY1=hpiGogdPCkgtft7fNZ4gPPj2TGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:03:35 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org,
liam.howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
david.laight.linux@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, mjguzik@...il.com, oliver.sang@...el.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
klarasmodin@...il.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/18] mm: replace vm_lock and detached flag with a
reference count
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:53 AM Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 02:46:49PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> ...
> > While this vm_lock replacement does not yet result in a smaller
> > vm_area_struct (it stays at 256 bytes due to cacheline alignment), it
> > allows for further size optimization by structure member regrouping
> > to bring the size of vm_area_struct below 192 bytes.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v9 [1]:
> > - Use __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire() in vma_start_read(),
> > per Hillf Danton
> > - Refactor vma_assert_locked() to avoid vm_refcnt read when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=n,
> > per Mateusz Guzik
> > - Update changelog, per Wei Yang
> > - Change vma_start_read() to return EAGAIN if vma got isolated and changed
> > lock_vma_under_rcu() back to detect this condition, per Wei Yang
> > - Change VM_BUG_ON_VMA() to WARN_ON_ONCE() when checking vma detached state,
> > per Lorenzo Stoakes
> > - Remove Vlastimil's Reviewed-by since code is changed
>
> This causes crashes (NULL pointer deref) with linux-next when running
> the ltp test suite; mtest06 (mmap1) test case.
>
> The bug seems to be quite obvious:
>
> > @@ -6424,15 +6492,18 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > if (!vma)
> > goto inval;
> >
> > - if (!vma_start_read(vma))
> > - goto inval;
> > + vma = vma_start_read(vma);
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vma)) {
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > + /* Check if the VMA got isolated after we found it */
> > + if (PTR_ERR(vma) == -EAGAIN) {
> > + vma_end_read(vma);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doh! Thanks for reporting! I'll post a fix shortly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists