[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2502202000410.65342@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 20:09:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...een.parts>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Alpha: Emulate unaligned LDx_L/STx_C for data
consistency
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > Complementing compiler support for the `-msafe-bwa' and `-msafe-partial'
> > > code generation options slated to land in GCC 15,
> >
> > Pointer? I can't find it on the gcc-patches list.
>
> I believe it's this:
>
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/alpine.DEB.2.21.2411141652300.9262@angie.orcam.me.uk/
That's the original series; v2 is here:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/alpine.DEB.2.21.2501050246590.49841@angie.orcam.me.uk/
> The first half or so have landed so far, right Maciej?
Yes, fixes for bugs discovered in the course have been committed and the
rest of changes already approved, although there were a couple of comments
I yet want to investigate/address by the end of next week. Getting clean
GCC test results with the kernel emulation was my objective before moving
forward.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists