[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14f3ae5c-bf74-4a1a-aaf6-b113f7821d4d@stanley.mountain>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:24:34 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: fix potential use-after-free with cfs bandwidth
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:33:24AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Markus, it was good to ask for a Fixes tag but now you're just distracting
> > people who are doing actual work.
>
> Will any contributors add also a “stable tag”?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst?h=v6.14-rc3#n3
>
Sure, it wouldn't hurt to add a stable tag. In real life terms the
stable scripts are going to pick this one up automatically because
it has "use-after-free" in the subject.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists