[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7lP5VA374-TuNZz@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 06:17:41 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <walmeida@...rosoft.com>,
Nell Shamrell-Harrington <nells@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
Konstantin Andrikopoulos <kernel@...dragore.io>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Roland Xu <mu001999@...look.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: workqueue: define built-in bh queues
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:45:38PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:36 PM Hamza Mahfooz
> <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > We provide these methods because it lets us access these queues from
> > Rust without using unsafe code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@...ux.microsoft.com>
>
> Cc'ing WORKQUEUE -- thanks!
Not meaning to complain but it by practical has no commit message.
Does not meet any quality standards in that area tbh. In order to
make Rust more appealing you really should pay more attention to
this.
I learned absolutely nothing from this.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists