[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022221-revert-hubcap-f519@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 07:28:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release.
> > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already?
Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go
off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have
reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists