[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z7mXDolRS+3nLAse@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:21:18 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review
On Sat 2025-02-22 07:28:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release.
> > > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already?
>
> Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go
> off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have
> reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues.
Well, quoting time down to second then doing something completely
different is quite confusing. Please fix your scripts.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists