linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025022213-brewery-synergy-b4bf@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:39:23 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/569] 6.1.129-rc2 review

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2025-02-22 07:28:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:45:15AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 2/20/2025 2:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.129 release.
> > > > There are 569 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Feb 2025 10:44:04 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > And yet there was a v6.1.29 tag created already?
> > 
> > Sometimes I'm faster, which is usually the case for -rc2 and later, I go
> > off of the -rc1 date if the people that had problems with -rc1 have
> > reported that the newer -rc fixes their reported issues.
> 
> Well, quoting time down to second then doing something completely
> different is quite confusing. Please fix your scripts.

Patches gladly welcome :)