[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3c74c7c-44b6-c4c0-872d-0de7e29214c0@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:12:53 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Coly Li <i@...y.li>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
song@...nel.org, colyli@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev, kch@...dia.com,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, zhengqixing@...wei.com,
john.g.garry@...cle.com, geliang@...nel.org, xni@...hat.com, colyli@...e.de,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] badblocks: return error if any badblock set fails
Hi,
在 2025/02/21 18:12, Coly Li 写道:
> So we don’t need to add a negative return value for partial success/failure?
>
> Coly Li.
Yes, I think so. No one really use this value, and patch 10 clean this
up by changing return type to bool.
Thanks,
Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists