linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] rdma: Converge on using secs_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250222181331.GS53094@unreal>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:13:31 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rdma: Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 08:17:31AM -0800, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 2/19/2025 11:07 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:36:38PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> >> This series converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() that either use the
> >> multiply pattern of either of:
> >> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or
> >> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
> >>
> >> where N is a constant or an expression, to avoid the multiplication.
> > 
> > Can you please provide justification for that? What is wrong with current code?
> > 
> 
> There is nothing specifically wrong with the current code.

So let's keep current code as is.

Thanks