[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250223001913.GQ1977892@ZenIV>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 00:19:13 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Ronald Monthero <debug.penguin32@...il.com>, al@...rsen.net,
gustavoars@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qnx4: fix to avoid panic due to buffer overflow
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 01:12:47PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> General tune is not holding the codebase hostage to obsolete (and
> probably not at all operational) components. If in doubt, prune it.
What exactly is being held hostage, though? Do we have an API change
that gets blocked just by the old filesystems and if so, which one
it is?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists