linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] qnx4: fix to avoid panic due to buffer overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250224-aufgaben-mitgearbeitet-0392505740ed@brauner>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:26:38 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Ronald Monthero <debug.penguin32@...il.com>, al@...rsen.net, gustavoars@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qnx4: fix to avoid panic due to buffer overflow

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 4:17 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 01:12:47PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > If it was not for the aforementioned bugfix, I would be sending a
> > > removal instead.
> >
> > Less code is fewer bugs. I'm for it. :)
> >
> 
> Removed code is debugged code.

We have both qnx4 and qnx6. Can anyone with authority speak as to the
usage of qnx4?