linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 13/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR handler with MCA Polling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB713493E48B5B09225DB5EA5F89C02@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:31:00 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
	<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 13/16] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR handler with MCA Polling

> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> [...]
> > Thanks for the explanation.
> > How about the 2nd check "mce_usable_address(m)"?
> >
> 
> It's not relevant. We want to always log deferred errors since they are
> uncorrectable.

Thanks for the explanation. The patch looks good to me.

   Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>