[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3349d2a-7eba-4865-9b58-0b2e7e57cc92@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:17:31 +0530
From: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>, <quic_anupkulk@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: Rename qcom,geni-se.yaml
to qcom,geni-se-qup.yaml
On 2/21/2025 5:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/02/2025 09:54, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>> The qcom,geni-se.yaml file describes the Qualcomm Universal Peripheral
>> (QUP) wrapper and the common entities required by QUP to run any Serial
>> Engine (SE) as I2C, SPI, UART, or I3C protocol.
>>
>> Rename qcom,geni-se.yaml to qcom,geni-se-qup.yaml to better reflect its
>> association with QUP (Qualcomm Universal Peripheral) and the compatible
>> string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <quic_vdadhani@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../soc/qcom/{qcom,geni-se.yaml => qcom,geni-se-qup.yaml} | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/{qcom,geni-se.yaml => qcom,geni-se-qup.yaml} (98%)
>>
>
> That's just churn for no real gain. Not even tested churn.
That's just churn for no real gain.
We made this change based on below plan, we think this will be helpful.
1. Rename qcom,geni-se.yaml to qcom,geni-se-qup.yaml. Reason at 2 below.
2. Create qcom,geni-se.yaml with shared properties for SE-protocol (spi,
i2c, uart) nodes. This will be helpful for the shared schema in the
ongoing changes
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f090d637-1ef1-4967-b5bc-6bfce3d7130e@kernel.org/T/.
Not even tested churn.
Sorry, we realized other SPI drivers also needs to be adjusted too. We
have validated dt_binding_check for i2c, spi, uart, and geni-se YAML
files but missed checking make refcheckdocs.
Please let us know if any command/step is missing in further validation,
that will help us.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists