linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: change quiet to low-power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250225142555.14005-1-lkml@antheas.dev>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:25:55 +0100
From: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
To: luke@...nes.dev,
	mario.limonciello@....com
Cc: corentin.chary@...il.com,
	hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-wmi: change quiet to low-power

Hi Luke,
please add appropriate attribution.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224195059.10185-1-lkml@antheas.dev/
Reported-by: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>

For me, this patch series plus the multi-platform profile one constitute
a double ABI break. Not only does the legacy sysfs for platform profile
regress when there is a second profile handler for a device, but all
hardcoded scripts for Asus devices will have to be updated.

While I would personally like to avoid this, I am ok with it, given
appropriate attribution, since I did go through the effort of reporting it
and providing a mitigation.

@Mario: you added Reviewed-by to a patch without proper attribution. Let's
not rehash our discussion from few days ago. Please try to do better when
it comes to attributions in the future.

Antheas