[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z749KuWROxQMsbnu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:59:06 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
will@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, stephen.smalley.work@...il.com,
omosnace@...hat.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next 1/2] perf: Remove unnecessary parameter of
security check
* Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 1:57 AM Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the attr parameter was never been used in security
> > checks since it was first introduced by:
> >
> > commit da97e18458fb ("perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks")
> >
> > so remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/events/intel/p4.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +-
> > include/linux/perf_event.h | 10 +++++-----
> > include/linux/security.h | 5 ++---
> > kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 4 ++--
> > security/security.c | 5 ++---
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> > 11 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> This patch seems fine to me from a LSM and SELinux perspective, but
> I'd want to see an ACK from the perf folks before I merge this.
A belated:
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Patch still seems to apply fine.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists