[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkX0oGnqM4BDfRt0+7Pcf31td8np3=dVg1ixcaDNoUyHkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:26:50 -0800
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com, avagin@...il.com,
benjamin@...solutions.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org,
sroettger@...gle.com, hch@....de, ojeda@...nel.org,
thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de, adobriyan@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, pedro.falcato@...il.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
willy@...radead.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jason@...c4.com, deller@....de,
rdunlap@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, peterx@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, gerg@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
groeck@...omium.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com,
mike.rapoport@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] mseal, system mappings: enable arm64
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:20 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:52:43PM +0000, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> >
> > Provide support for CONFIG_MSEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS on arm64, covering
> > the vdso, vvar, and compat-mode vectors and sigpage mappings.
> >
> > Production release testing passes on Android and Chrome OS.
>
> This is pretty limited (yes yes I know android is massive etc. but we must
> account for all the weird and wonderful arm64 devices out there in context of
> upstream :)
>
> Have you looking through all arm64-code relating to vdso, vvar, compat-mode
> vectors, sigpage mapping and ensured nothing kernel-side relies upon relocation?
> Some arches actually seem to want to do this. Pretty sure PPC does... so a bit
> nervous of that.
>
Can you please point out where PPC munmap/mremap the vdso ?
Previously, when you mentioned that, I thought you meant user space in
PPC, I didn't realize that you meant that kernel code in PPC. I
tried, but didn't find anything, hence asking.
Thanks.
-Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists