[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkWXvc0p5u+AwFEHXVM00nX=n3ROKwEp8RaYWEZ-3-n5sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:37:46 -0800
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, oleg@...hat.com, avagin@...il.com,
benjamin@...solutions.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org,
sroettger@...gle.com, hch@....de, ojeda@...nel.org,
thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de, adobriyan@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, pedro.falcato@...il.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
willy@...radead.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jason@...c4.com, deller@....de,
rdunlap@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, peterx@...hat.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, gerg@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
groeck@...omium.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com,
mike.rapoport@...il.com, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] selftests: x86: test_mremap_vdso: skip if vdso is msealed
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:15 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:52:41PM +0000, jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> >
> > Add code to detect if the vdso is memory sealed, skip the test
> > if it is.
>
> I feel this is a little succinct of a commit message, but I guess it gets to the
> heart of what you're doing here.
>
> Fundamentally I mean it makes sense, but I'm concerned that x86 has a test
> -expliictly checking- whether mremap() of VDSO is possible - are there cases
> where x86 might want to do this internal to the kernel?
>
> I guess not since this is essentially a userland self test and probably
> asserting you can do this in the way rr, etc. do.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
>
> Anyway, this aside, this looks fine, aside from nit below, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>
> > ---
> > .../testing/selftests/x86/test_mremap_vdso.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_mremap_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_mremap_vdso.c
> > index d53959e03593..94bee6e0c813 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_mremap_vdso.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_mremap_vdso.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> >
> > #include <sys/mman.h>
> > #include <sys/auxv.h>
> > @@ -55,13 +56,55 @@ static int try_to_remap(void *vdso_addr, unsigned long size)
> >
> > }
> >
> > +#define VDSO_NAME "[vdso]"
> > +#define VMFLAGS "VmFlags:"
> > +#define MSEAL_FLAGS "sl"
> > +#define MAX_LINE_LEN 512
> > +
> > +bool vdso_sealed(FILE *maps)
>
> Should be static?
>
sure.
> > +{
> > + char line[MAX_LINE_LEN];
> > + bool has_vdso = false;
> > +
> > + while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), maps)) {
> > + if (strstr(line, VDSO_NAME))
> > + has_vdso = true;
> > +
> > + if (has_vdso && !strncmp(line, VMFLAGS, strlen(VMFLAGS))) {
> > + if (strstr(line, MSEAL_FLAGS))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> > {
> > pid_t child;
> > + FILE *maps;
> >
> > ksft_print_header();
> > ksft_set_plan(1);
> >
> > + maps = fopen("/proc/self/smaps", "r");
> > + if (!maps) {
> > + ksft_test_result_skip(
> > + "Could not open /proc/self/smaps, errno=%d\n",
> > + errno);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (vdso_sealed(maps)) {
> > + ksft_test_result_skip("vdso is sealed\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fclose(maps);
> > +
> > child = fork();
> > if (child == -1)
> > ksft_exit_fail_msg("failed to fork (%d): %m\n", errno);
> > --
> > 2.48.1.658.g4767266eb4-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists