[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MAZPR01MB9162FA24821C3E02472CF028FEC32@MAZPR01MB9162.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:44:04 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] riscv: dts: sophgo: add Sophgo SPI NOR controller
driver
On 2025/2/25 8:38, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:23:36AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> On 2025/2/24 18:12, Longbin Li wrote:
>>> Add SPI NOR device node for Sophgo.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++
>>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044.dtsi | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
>>> index c50e61a50013..9c634920f37e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
>>> @@ -80,6 +80,24 @@ &sd {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&spifmc0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + flash@0 {
>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&spifmc1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + flash@0 {
>>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> &uart1 {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> };
>> What is your baseline? I can't see "sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts " on the latest
>> mainline yet.
>>
> It seems like he forgot to remove this patch as the baseline is not
> submitted.
>
>> BTW, the name "sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10" seems a bit redundant. Wouldn't
>> "sg2044-sd3-10" be better?
>>
> I do not think so. we want <soc-vendor-board> format. In this format.
> sophgo is a must.
All these dts* files are under "sophgo" folder, that's why I think
"sophgo" is redundant for file name.
Anyway, if you do WANT the format, I won't object strongly.
>
> Regards,
> Inochi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists