[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527693E12F3AE890697C00608CC32@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:37:53 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, "Will
Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, "Jason
Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Move PRI enablement in probe path
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 1:16 PM
>
> @@ -3743,6 +3743,16 @@ static struct iommu_device
> *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> else
> info->ats_enabled = 1;
> }
> +
> + if (info->ats_enabled && info->pri_supported) {
> + /* PASID is required in PRG Response Message. */
> + if (info->pasid_enabled
> || !pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(pdev)) {
this should be:
if (!info->pasid_enabled || pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(pdev))
> @@ -3761,6 +3771,13 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct
> device *dev)
> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>
> + WARN_ON(info->iopf_refcount);
call iopf_queue_remove_device() in this case?
> +void intel_iommu_disable_iopf(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!info->pri_enabled))
> + return;
also warn on !info->iopf_refcount
Powered by blists - more mailing lists