[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB52763EE4B5976621A7797DBD8CC32@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:43:15 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, "Will
Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, "Jason
Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup
intel_context_flush_present()
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 1:16 PM
>
> The intel_context_flush_present() is called in places where either the
> scalable mode is disabled, or scalable mode is enabled but all PASID
> entries are known to be non-present. In these cases, the flush_domains
> path within intel_context_flush_present() will never execute. This dead
> code is therefore removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
usually a suffix "_present()" indicates that the helper can be called
on an object which is currently in-use, which is obviously not the
case here.
To avoid confusion probably just call it intel_context_flush() or
intel_context_flush_no_user() is clearer.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists