[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <366d8fee-e39e-bb01-db91-ecf359591ea5@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:13:26 +0800
From: Li Nan <linan666@...weicloud.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>,
Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
song@...nel.org, colyli@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev, kch@...dia.com, hare@...e.de,
zhengqixing@...wei.com, john.g.garry@...cle.com, geliang@...nel.org,
xni@...hat.com, colyli@...e.de
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] badblocks: return error directly when setting
badblocks exceeds 512
在 2025/2/21 17:55, Yu Kuai 写道:
> Hi,
>
> +CC Linan
>
> 在 2025/02/21 16:11, Zheng Qixing 写道:
>> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>>
>> In the current handling of badblocks settings, a lot of processing has
>> been done for scenarios where the number of badblocks exceeds 512.
>> This makes the code look quite complex and also introduces some issues,
>
> It's better to add explanations about these issues here.
>>
Thank you for your review. I will add more details in the next version.
--
Thanks,
Nan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists