[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4259A207-7B5F-4D25-A8AE-144D24554201@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:35:26 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
CC: Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, airlied@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alistair@...ple.id.au,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com, awalls@...metrocast.net, bp@...en8.de,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
davem@...emloft.net, david.laight.linux@...il.com,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
eajames@...ux.ibm.com, edumazet@...gle.com, eleanor15x@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, jirislaby@...nel.org, jk@...abs.org,
joel@....id.au, johannes@...solutions.net, jonas@...boo.se,
jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw, kuba@...nel.org, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, louis.peens@...igine.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, mripard@...nel.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
parthiban.veerasooran@...rochip.com, rfoss@...nel.org, richard@....at,
simona@...ll.ch, tglx@...utronix.de, tzimmermann@...e.de,
vigneshr@...com, visitorckw@...il.com, x86@...nel.org,
yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] bitops: Add generic parity calculation for u64
On February 25, 2025 1:43:27 PM PST, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>> Incidentally, in all of this, didn't anyone notice __builtin_parity()?
>
>Yes. It it has done sane for a decade on x86, yet does things such as
>emitting a library call on other architectures.
>
>https://godbolt.org/z/6qG3noebq
>
>~Andrew
And not even a smart one at that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists