lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025022621-worshiper-turtle-6eb1@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:21:11 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable <stable@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "libfs: Use d_children list to iterate
 simple_offset directories"

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:57:48AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 2/26/25 9:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit b9b588f22a0c049a14885399e27625635ae6ef91.
> > 
> > There are reports of this commit breaking Chrome's rendering mode.  As
> > no one seems to want to do a root-cause, let's just revert it for now as
> > it is affecting people using the latest release as well as the stable
> > kernels that it has been backported to.
> 
> NACK. This re-introduces a CVE.

As I said elsewhere, when a commit that is assigned a CVE is reverted,
then the CVE gets revoked.  But I don't see this commit being assigned
to a CVE, so what CVE specifically are you referring to?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ