lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLghwkK4S12eMUm3bgMXvYMNf_1Gi9ws9q-53OZPdB+QHQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:38:51 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust/faux: Add missing parent argument to Registration::new()

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:31 PM Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> A little late in the review of the faux device interface, we added the
> ability to specify a parent device when creating new faux devices - but
> this never got ported over to the rust bindings. So, let's add the missing
> argument now so we don't have to convert other users later down the line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/faux.rs              | 10 ++++++++--
>  samples/rust/rust_driver_faux.rs |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/faux.rs b/rust/kernel/faux.rs
> index 41751403cd868..ae99ea3d114ef 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/faux.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/faux.rs
> @@ -23,11 +23,17 @@
>
>  impl Registration {
>      /// Create and register a new faux device with the given name.
> -    pub fn new(name: &CStr) -> Result<Self> {
> +    pub fn new(name: &CStr, parent: Option<&device::Device>) -> Result<Self> {
>          // SAFETY:
>          // - `name` is copied by this function into its own storage
>          // - `faux_ops` is safe to leave NULL according to the C API
> -        let dev = unsafe { bindings::faux_device_create(name.as_char_ptr(), null_mut(), null()) };
> +        let dev = unsafe {
> +            bindings::faux_device_create(
> +                name.as_char_ptr(),
> +                parent.map_or(null_mut(), |p| p.as_raw()),
> +                null(),

This function signature only requires that `parent` is valid for the
duration of this call to `new`, but `faux_device_create` stashes a
pointer without touching the refcount. How do you ensure that the
`parent` pointer does not become dangling?

Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ