linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: add CIX P1 (SKY1) SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <816a3601-4ce1-47ef-8ef9-befc39c479c5@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:30:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com,
 marcin@...zkiewicz.com.pl, Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@...tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: add CIX P1 (SKY1) SoC

On 26/02/2025 11:26, Peter Chen wrote:
> On 25-02-26 09:40:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26/02/2025 02:21, Peter Chen wrote:
>>>>> Add device tree bindings for CIX P1 (Internal name sky1) Arm SoC,
>>>>> it consists several SoC models like CP8180, CD8180, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@...tech.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> <form letter>
>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>>>
>>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>>>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>>>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>>>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>>>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>>>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>>>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>>>
>>>> Please read:
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>>>
>>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>> </form letter>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have checked the review-process again at:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=935897
>>
>> This does not matter - that's not a patchwork anyone uses...
>>
>>> It seems no one gives any Reviewed-by or Acked-by Tag.
>>
>> You were directly addressed! So you got email and what did you do with it?
>>
>> And lists received it:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@kernel.org/
>>
> 
> I am sorry about that. I checked this email with our IT engineers at
> office365 administration page, it was not received by Microsoft office365
> server, we don't know what's the reason.


That's the only email which did not reach you, I think. 4 or 5 others
did, so this could mean your system will spam/reject silently anything
with review tag (or email address).

If so, your corporate mail system is not suitable for upstream work
(Microsoft outlook is known of poor quality in that matter and that's
not the first case people have trouble with Outlook servers) and maybe
you should switch to b4-relay and other mail boxes.

> 
> I will put your Reviewed-by tag when sending v3 patch, may I get your
> Ack for the 1st patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/330a01b7-7285-47fe-abb1-8d5fa71dd240@kernel.org/T/#u


I'll send it, but I still have doubts Microsoft won't put me in spam :/


Best regards,
Krzysztof