[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z77sSg_3YC30oYoP@nchen-desktop>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:26:18 +0800
From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com,
marcin@...zkiewicz.com.pl, Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@...tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: add CIX P1 (SKY1) SoC
On 25-02-26 09:40:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26/02/2025 02:21, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>> Add device tree bindings for CIX P1 (Internal name sky1) Arm SoC,
> >>> it consists several SoC models like CP8180, CD8180, etc.
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@...tech.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> <form letter>
> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> >>
> >> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> >>
> >> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> >> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
> >> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> >> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> >> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
> >> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
> >> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
> >> tags received on the version they apply.
> >>
> >> Please read:
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> >>
> >> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >> </form letter>
> >>
> >
> > I have checked the review-process again at:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=935897
>
> This does not matter - that's not a patchwork anyone uses...
>
> > It seems no one gives any Reviewed-by or Acked-by Tag.
>
> You were directly addressed! So you got email and what did you do with it?
>
> And lists received it:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@kernel.org/
>
I am sorry about that. I checked this email with our IT engineers at
office365 administration page, it was not received by Microsoft office365
server, we don't know what's the reason.
I will put your Reviewed-by tag when sending v3 patch, may I get your
Ack for the 1st patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/330a01b7-7285-47fe-abb1-8d5fa71dd240@kernel.org/T/#u
--
Best regards,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists