[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <593e1777-a033-4922-93c4-c056e6b9bf4c@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 18:52:11 +0800
From: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose
<suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark
<james.clark@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <kernel@...cinc.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kernel@....qualcomm.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: Add Coresight device Trace NOC
definition
On 2/22/2025 6:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/02/2025 08:40, Yuanfang Zhang wrote:
>> Adds new coresight-tnoc.yaml file describing the bindings required
>> to define Trace NOC in the device trees.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>
>
>
> So you just sent the same v1, ignoring previous review. That's not how
> it works.
>
sorry for this incorrect process. because i just update --to-cc list and no other
change, i forced the version to V1, hoped it would work like resend,
but the result was not as expected.
> Provide proper changelog, implement ENTIRE feedback and do no ask
> maintainers do point the same issues TWICE.
>
> NAK
>
> <form letter>
> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
> Thank you.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists