[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19e9db80-e493-4494-a57f-18118c1ffad1@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:07:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
<mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: Add Coresight device Trace NOC
definition
On 26/02/2025 11:52, Yuanfang Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/2025 6:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2025 08:40, Yuanfang Zhang wrote:
>>> Adds new coresight-tnoc.yaml file describing the bindings required
>>> to define Trace NOC in the device trees.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>
>>
>>
>> So you just sent the same v1, ignoring previous review. That's not how
>> it works.
>>
> sorry for this incorrect process. because i just update --to-cc list and no other
> change, i forced the version to V1, hoped it would work like resend,
> but the result was not as expected.
But you got feedback, so why resending without implementing it? That's
the problem, not you labeled/not-labeled it as resend.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists