[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fzigsonsdbtvo6aorgvzlh4mvbpvikbz6iwh6h5jx53e7zd7m4@munr3ea5nbme>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:09:55 -0600
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
CC: <da.gomez@...nel.org>, Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, "Nathan
Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers
<nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Justin Stitt
<justinstitt@...gle.com>, <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@...sung.com>, Theodore Ts'o
<tytso@....edu>, <gost.dev@...sung.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] drm/xe: xe_gen_wa_oob: replace
program_invocation_short_name
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:39:21AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>Hi Lucas, chiming in here since I also care about building on macOS.
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:05 AM Lucas De Marchi
><lucas.demarchi@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is this the approach taken for other similar issues you had? Note that
>> argv[0] and program_invocation_short_name are not the same thing. For
>> this particular binary I don't really care and if it's the approach
>> taken in other places, I'm ok using it.
>
>Believe it or not, this is the only place that
>program_invocation_short_name has ever been used in the kernel. There
>have been numerous instances of:
>
>#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for program_invocation_short_name */
>
>but never any actual callers (that I could find in the git history)
>other than this one.
>
>> I was expecting you'd take the acks and merge it all through a single
>> tree since you received push back on the need to build the kernel in
>> macOS. Is this the only thing missing and you'd want it to go through
>> drm?
>
>I believe the other patches have been applied or dropped. When I last
>tested building allmodconfig this was the only issue I ran into (macOS
>arm64), so I asked Daniel for this resend.
fair enough. Pushed to drm-xe-next since nobody ever reads the
usage for this helper tool and it doesn't really matter if now it's ugly.
Lucas De Marchi
>
>Cheers.
>Tamir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists