lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250227144410.275469fc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:44:10 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the mm tree as a different commit (but
the same patch):

  a37259732a7d ("x86/mm: Make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional")

This is commit

  a30104ede395 ("x86/mm: make MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE unconditional")

in the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

This is already causing a conflct in arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c due commit

  f2c5c2105827 ("x86/mm: Remove pv_ops.mmu.tlb_remove_table call")

in the tip tree (where I just used the tip tree version).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ