lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e48c69a-973c-48ef-892e-f84de6c17673@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:41:45 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Trilok Soni
	<quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik
	<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Update protected clocks
 list



On 2/26/2025 11:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 26.02.2025 6:01 AM, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> On 2/25/2025 8:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:43:21PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>> Certain clocks are not accessible on QCM6490-IDP board,
>>>> thus mark them as protected.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Mark few clocks as protected on IDP of QCM6490.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is separated out from the series[1] to remove dependency from
>>>> the LPASS reset.
>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240816-qcm6490-lpass-reset-v1-0-a11f33cad3c5@quicinc.com/
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> I merged the patch adding this board in November 2023, are you saying
>>> that for the last 15 months no one has actually booted it!?
>>
>> Should we just delete these boards? I prefer to not have platforms which 
>> are not maintained.
> 
> I think there's enough RB3Gen2s in the wild now to get rid of this one..
> Unless anyone has a real use for it, but it doesn't seem like that's the
> case given the lack of activity
> 

At least there were requests for me to get this board boot up and that
is where this patch comes. I agree if they are not supported, should be
removed.

> Konrad


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ