[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250227094042.GZ5777@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:40:42 +0100
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:32:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'btrfs_set_folio_subpage':
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:874:45: error: passing argument 2 of 'btrfs_is_subpage' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 874 | if (!btrfs_is_subpage(fs_info, folio->mapping))
> | ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | struct address_space *
> In file included from fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:26:
> fs/btrfs/subpage.h:95:51: note: expected 'struct folio *' but argument is of type 'struct address_space *'
> 95 | struct folio *folio)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 40524fd05deb ("btrfs: kill EXTENT_FOLIO_PRIVATE")
>
> I have used the btffs tree from next-20250226 for today.
Fixed in in today's for-next snapshot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists