[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PN0PR01MB958840C7836018AB49819981B8CC2@PN0PR01MB9588.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:09:36 +0000
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "castet.matthieu@...e.fr" <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>, "stf_xl@...pl"
<stf_xl@...pl>, "b-liu@...com" <b-liu@...com>, "johan@...nel.org"
<johan@...nel.org>, "heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com"
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, "valentina.manea.m@...il.com"
<valentina.manea.m@...il.com>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"i@...ithal.me" <i@...ithal.me>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: replace strcpy() with strscpy()
> On 28 Feb 2025, at 10:33 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:07:03PM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
>>
>> The strcpy() function has been deprecated and replaced with strscpy().
>> This patch shall replace it in the whole USB tree.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
>
> As the two functions do different things, are you sure it is safe to
> just do a search/replace here? If so, you need to explain that in the
> changelog why this is ok, and if not, please document that as well :)
That's actually a good question. From what I can tell from the kernel docs, the only case where this can be a problem is when strcpy is returning. While I don't see any such case over here, I'll still double check if that's the case. Also, I'll wait for the kernel test bot results.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists