[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250228191213.7drb265s7jrrjf7b@jpoimboe>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:12:13 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com, artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, gautham.shenoy@....com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG objtool,x86] Missing __noreturn annotation in
acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead()
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:00:07AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My recent -next testing hits this objtool complaint:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: acpi_idle_play_dead+0x3c: acpi_processor_ffh_play_dead() is missing a __noreturn annotation
>
> My attempts to silence this by adding the suggested __noreturn annotations
> didn't help, and often got me compiler warnings about __noreturn functions
> actually returning. So I bisected, which converges on this innocent-looking
> commit:
>
> a7dd183f0b38 ("x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint")
>
> Several runs verified that this really is the commit that objtool is
> complaining about. Unfortunately, this commit does not revert cleanly.
>
> This is from builds using clang version 19.1.5 (CentOS 19.1.5-2.el9).
>
> Help?
I can take a look. Is it LLVM defconfig? Otherwise can you send the
.config?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists