| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ca2xiobwbga3bet6u4ktsyo62p2l7vvzetkyzkr7ovu6soo4fb@uprexbwa7z6w>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:39:40 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/15] drm/msm/dpu: support SSPP assignment for
quad-pipe case
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 08:31:02PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Currently, SSPPs are assigned to a maximum of two pipes. However,
> quad-pipe usage scenarios require four pipes and involve configuring
> two stages. In quad-pipe case, the first two pipes share a set of
> mixer configurations and enable multi-rect mode when certain
> conditions are met. The same applies to the subsequent two pipes.
>
> Assign SSPPs to the pipes in each stage using a unified method and
> to loop the stages accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 11 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> index 0a053c5888262d863a1e549e14e3aa40a80c3f06..9405453cbf5d852e72a5f954cd8c6aed3a222723 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> @@ -1366,6 +1366,17 @@ int dpu_crtc_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool en)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * dpu_crtc_get_num_lm - Get mixer number in this CRTC pipeline
> + * @state: Pointer to drm crtc state object
> + */
> +unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> +{
> + struct dpu_crtc_state *cstate = to_dpu_crtc_state(state);
> +
> + return cstate->num_mixers;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> static int _dpu_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> index 0b148f3ce0d7af80ec4ffcd31d8632a5815b16f1..b14bab2754635953da402d09e11a43b9b4cf4153 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> @@ -264,4 +264,6 @@ static inline enum dpu_crtc_client_type dpu_crtc_get_client_type(
>
> void dpu_crtc_frame_event_cb(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 event);
>
> +unsigned int dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(const struct drm_crtc_state *state);
> +
> #endif /* _DPU_CRTC_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index d67f2ad20b4754ca4bcb759a65a39628b7236b0f..d1d6c91ed0f8e1c62b757ca42546fbc421609f72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -1112,11 +1112,10 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct dpu_rm_sspp_requirements reqs;
> struct dpu_plane_state *pstate;
> struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe;
> - struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe;
> struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg;
> - struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
> + struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
> const struct msm_format *fmt;
> - int i;
> + int i, num_lm, stage_id, num_stages;
>
> if (plane_state->crtc)
> crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> @@ -1124,11 +1123,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(plane_state);
>
> - pipe = &pstate->pipe[0];
> - r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[1];
> - pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[0];
> - r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[1];
> -
> for (i = 0; i < PIPES_PER_PLANE; i++)
> pstate->pipe[i].sspp = NULL;
>
> @@ -1142,24 +1136,49 @@ static int dpu_plane_virtual_assign_resources(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>
> reqs.rot90 = drm_rotation_90_or_270(plane_state->rotation);
>
> - pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_reserve_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state, crtc, &reqs);
> - if (!pipe->sspp)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (!dpu_plane_try_multirect_parallel(pipe, pipe_cfg, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg,
> - pipe->sspp,
> - msm_framebuffer_format(plane_state->fb),
> - dpu_kms->catalog->caps->max_linewidth)) {
> - /* multirect is not possible, use two SSPP blocks */
> - r_pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_reserve_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state, crtc, &reqs);
> - if (!r_pipe->sspp)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> - pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> -
> - r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> - r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> + num_lm = dpu_crtc_get_num_lm(crtc_state);
> + num_stages = (num_lm + 1) / 2;
> + for (stage_id = 0; stage_id < num_stages; stage_id++) {
> + for (i = stage_id * PIPES_PER_STAGE; i < (stage_id + 1) * PIPES_PER_STAGE; i++) {
> + struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe;
> + struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg;
> +
> + pipe = &pstate->pipe[i];
> + pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[i];
> +
> + if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_reserve_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, global_state, crtc, &reqs);
> + if (!pipe->sspp)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /* use solo SSPP for the 2nd pipe in pipe pair */
> + if (i % PIPES_PER_STAGE != 0)
> + goto use_solo_sspp;
With this in place, do we need the nested loops? Wouldn't it be enough
to loop through the all pipes in a single run, as this condition will
force solo SSPP for the second pipes?
> +
> + /*
> + * Check multi-rect opportunity for the 2nd pipe in the
> + * pair. SSPP multi-rect mode cross mixer pairs is not
> + * supported.
> + */
> + r_pipe = &pstate->pipe[i + 1];
> + r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg[i + 1];
> +
> + if (drm_rect_width(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect) != 0 &&
> + dpu_plane_try_multirect_parallel(pipe, pipe_cfg, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg,
> + pipe->sspp,
> + msm_framebuffer_format(plane_state->fb),
> + dpu_kms->catalog->caps->max_linewidth)) {
> + i++;
> + continue;
> + }
> +use_solo_sspp:
> + pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> + pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> + DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "allocating sspp_%d for pipe %d.\n",
> + pipe->sspp->idx - SSPP_NONE, i);
> + }
> }
>
> return dpu_plane_atomic_check_sspp(plane, state, crtc_state);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists