[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8LDSjhcXvwnyeiF@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 16:20:26 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yidong Zhang <yidong.zhang@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
mdf@...nel.org, hao.wu@...el.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
lizhi.hou@....com, DMG Karthik <Karthik.DMG@....com>,
Nishad Saraf <nishads@....com>,
Hayden Laccabue <hayden.laccabue@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] drivers/fpga/amd: Add new driver amd versal-pci
> My last question for this topic:
> If we decide to upstream both userPF and mgmtPF driver together, could them
> be both within the drivers/fpga/amd as in-tree driver? This will help user
I don't look into your full driver stack. Generally, if your drivers are
all about reprogramming, then yes. If they are also about all kinds of
accelaration functions you'd better split them out in different domains.
I may not have enough knowledge to make them correct.
Thanks,
Yilun
> find source code easily.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists