[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174109804670.69310.9373110369182366922.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 14:20:46 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>,
Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt6359: Fix DT parse error due to
wrong child node name
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:32:19 +0100, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote:
> A recent dtbs_check error fix in mt6359.dtsi file changed a node name
> (from "mt6359codec" to "audio-codec") without modifying the mt6539
> codec code that uses it.
> It leads to a probe failure after devicetree parsing returns in error:
> ```
> [ 1.354025] mt6359-sound mt6359-sound: mt6359_platform_driver_probe() failed to parse dts
> [ 1.355066] mt6359-sound mt6359-sound: probe with driver mt6359-sound failed with error -22
> ```
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt6359: Fix DT parse error due to wrong child node name
commit: 79c080c75cdd0a5ba38be039f6f9bb66ec53b0c4
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists